[TOC]
- Title: LLM+P Empowering Large Language Models With Optimal Planning Proficiency
- Author: Bo Liu
- Publish Year: 5 May 2023
- Review Date: Mon, May 22, 2023
- url: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.11477.pdf
Summary of paper
Motivation
- However, so far, LLMs cannot reliably solve long-horizon planning problems. By contrast, classical planners, once a problem is given in a formatted way, can use efficient search algorithms to quickly identify correct, or even optimal plans.
Contribution
- introduce LLM+P, it takes in a natural language description of a planning problem, then return a correct plan for solving that problem in natural language. LLM+P does so by first converting the language description into a file written in the planning domain definition language (PDDL)
- limitation of the paper: In this paper, we do not ask the LLM to recognize that it has been posed a prompt that is suitable for processing using the proposed LLM+P pipeline.
Some key terms
limitation of LLMs
- LLMs have become amazingly proficient at linguistic competence โ knowing how to say things; but they are not nearly as good at functional competence โ knowing what to say.
Architecture
-
-
-
assumptions
- A chatbot knows when to trigger LLM+P based on its conversation with a human user
- A domain PDDL file is provided for the problem the user asks for
- A simple problem description in natural language and its corresponding problem PDDL file are also provided beforehand. (used as context)
Results
Potential future work
- ALFRED contains the exploration process. how can ensure that all the required objects are found during exploration